The Supreme Court Saturday aforementioned the underlying structure below the controversial website at Ayodhya wasn't associate degree monotheism structure, however, the ASI has not established whether or not a temple was dismantled to create a place of worship.
 |
| In a file photo of the Supreme Court. |
The Supreme Court Saturday aforementioned the underlying structure below the controversial website at Ayodhya wasn't associate degree monotheism structure, however, the ASI has not established whether or not a temple was dismantled to create a place of worship.
The observation by a 5-judge Constitution bench, headed by jurist Ranjan Gogoi, was created in its finding of fact within the politically sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri mosque land dispute in Ayodhya.
The bench, conjointly comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer, any aforementioned that terming the archaeological proof as simply associate degree opinion would be a good ill turn to the archeologic Survey of the Republic of India.
The court was conjointly aforementioned that the Hindus take into account the controversial website because the birthplace of Lord Ram and even Muslims say this that place.
The faith of the Hindus that Lord Ram was born at the dismantled structure is undisputed, the apex court aforementioned.
The bench aforementioned the existence of mythical being Rasoi, Ram Chabutra and Bhandar grih area unit the testimony of the non-secular truth of the place.
The apex court, however, aforementioned that the title can not be established on the bottom of religion, belief and that the area unit solely associate degree indicator for deciding the dispute.